Abstract

A two track approach to understanding Philosophy and Science is yet necessary in order to truly comprehend metaphysics, particularly on the issue of ‘a priori’ judgment. Today, cause-effect proposition is the staple of natural science and governs acceptable discoveries. The question is whether a word is quantifiable, scalarly and/or vectorially? Does a spoken word carry the same weight and meaning when uttered by a General, Sergeant or private? Does context matter in science and philosophy? The paper makes the distinction in the form of matter with careful emphasis on the form and ‘materiality’ of the spoken word. Experience is more meaningful with an intermediate or reflective causal pre-determinative agency that essentially measures a shift in norm. The unknown remains unreal until it is discerned. Cognition of the essence is possible with knowledge but non-recognition does not entail absence. The resonant character of the original being must be reflected in the message and the players, for context.